Originally Posted by
loop
Nosferatu, there's really no point to defend one or the other. Practically both work and will do the job.
It's really not about Mac can and Windows can't do the job - they both can. It's just that one is Unix, the other is not.
OS X is Darwin based. Memory and process management are very well designed. The entire microkernel and kernel drivers cigarette module design are superior, the network layer is taken from FreeBSD - nothing better than that. The underlaying API is mostly coming from the NextStep OS, which is written by the team behind BeOS.
I have professional experience with Windows, Solaris, AIX, Linux and FreeBSD as Application, Database and Network servers. Also played with others. I'm a Software Engineer and I'm managing enterprise software projects for the past 6 years and I'm getting dirty into how these beasts work. Deep dirty at times.
Engineering wise, OS X/Darwin is a state of the art OS. On top of it runs a very nice UI - like it or not is subjective. Due to legacy and backward compatibility reasons, Windows cannot become as good OS as OS X is (not to speak for FreeBSD, Solaris, etc).
MS' Engineering Team is very capable and I respect them a lot.
EDIT: And BTW, I've checked your dream setup - Latitude is actually my favorite laptop, before I had MBP. I still think it's superior to the MBP in many aspects. It just lacks OS X ... and the backlit keyboard :-P
Cheers!
Bookmarks