Brought to you by the makers of Mixed in Key, Platinum Notes (PN) is the tool you need to put that extra polish on your mp3s to make them really sizzle in the clubs. Some of the things you can expect are:
- Automatically adjust the tracks volume, so that every track has the same perceived loudness.
- Repair clipped peaks
- Adjust the dynamics of the music if needed
- Adjust the pitch of the tracks if needed, to make perfect harmonic mixes.
So, does it work as advertised? I’ve tried the software on numerous tracks, like Beatport MP3, ripped CDs, and on various musical genres, from pumping techno to disco. Let’s take those features one by one:
-
Adjust a tracks volume.
It is very useful to have your tracks ready to play at the same apparent volume. Your faders then have the same range, and there is no embarrassment when suddenly dropping a track that’s too loud or too soft. There are some apps that do that already, like MP3gain, but only works with mp3 and can take a lot of time. Platinum Notes on the other hand can work on MP3, m4a, wav or aiff.
The results are very good and every track is spot on volume wise so you can forget about your gain knob. Trying to use the auto gain function of Traktor with tracks adjusted in Platinum Notes often show a slight disagreement, and sometimes a large one.
-
Repair clipped peaks
Some of my Beatport MP3s had more than 2000 clipped peaks according to PN! There are usually from 10 to 50 in any recent track. I tried to clip to death a good track, run it through PN, and then watch for the clipped peaks in Logic, but since other processing has been done, it wasn’t very obvious. I then did an A/B listening test with Traktor, and there sure was some harshness removed. Here is a sample clipped track, and then the result when ran through PN:
To do an A/B test in Traktor, load both tracks, turn on the auto-gain, loop the tracks, phase them, and use the crossfader.
-
Adjust the dynamics
If the dynamics of a selected song are correct then nothing is done. The track will have its overall gain adjusted with a gentle IRC limiter. If the track average volume looks bad enough, then its run through an compressor. The input volume of the compressor is set by the average volume of the track.
On the various tracks I tried PN on, the end result taken track by track is really good most of the time when doing an A/B. The processing has evolved since version 1.0, and is now a bit more bass heavy. This translates well on a big system so you really need a sub or big speakers to enjoy what PN does to your music. Many over mastered tracks have some contrast added and really do sound better than the original. The different parts are well balanced and have more relative volume. When a song hits after a break, it hits, when previously- it just went on. The more butchered at the mastering stage a track was, the more obvious this effect is.
Editors note (given how over compressed everything is ala “Justice” this could be a godsend for achieving a normal sounding electro set)
Songs which did not go through dynamics processing sound a bit more full, but nothing extravagant. Strictly speaking, from an audiophile point of view, most the tracks sound somehow different. Sometimes the processed version is way better than the original, sometimes the original sounds a bit better, clearer.
On 95% of recent banging music, I would clearly go for the processed version. On non electronic old tracks, I’ll say that 50% of the tracks are better, the rest is ok, but pale a bit when compared to the original.
The thing that is important here from a Dj point of view is the coherence that Platinum Notes brings. If I can use an analogy with video, it is like all your sources have been balanced to have the same apparent brightness (volume) and contrast (dynamics). You can then go from one to the other seamlessly because they appear to be from the same source.
You could only achieve this effect previously if you played a set with records which were all from the same label, or from the same album. Most of the time had the same sound simply because the end mastering was done by the same guy… PN gives the same gentle polish to all the songs in your collection, and this makes them more easy to mix. When you add the de-clipping and the restoration of dynamics, your sets suddenly sound together, clean and contrasted.
The restored dynamics also mean that your music will be less tiring to listen to in the long run, and people will thank you for that. Some songs will perhaps sound a bit worse than if you had played the original, but this is largely compensated by the coherence, and overall your music does sound better.
-
Pitch correction.
Sometimes when you do an harmonic mix, it doesn’t sound as good as it theoretically should. This is because the whole song is a bit off key. PN track that and then adjusts your song so that it is perfectly in key. This works really well too, and when you do a whole harmonic set, it flows seamlessly. The drawback is that the pitching algorithm, while being probably the best out there (it is the same one that is used in Ableton Live), does slightly distort the sound. This is unavoidable, but is further compounded by the fact that your are going to use the same kind of processing again if you turn on the Key Lock of your Dj software.
This is far from being a show stopper though, and like with the dynamics processing, the added coherence is well worth it. Also, this only happens with off key songs, and there aren’t this many, maybe between 10-15%. A possible solution for that would be to have PN integrated with your Dj software, telling it directly how to correct the key of your tracks at the Key Lock level.
-
So, is it worth it?
Sure, at $98it is a bit on the pricey side. This is because the developers had to license the mastering and the pitching components. Pro audio plug-ins have a cost and the mastering plug used here costs $200 when you buy it separately for example. Then again, adding an overall polish and consistency to your mixes will go a long way to setting you apart from the crowd and will mean more gigs in the end. Cant afford it? Enter the contest bellow and we will give you away a couple of free copies courtesy of our friends at Platinum Notes.
Get it For Free!
Enter your email here to win a copy of Platinum Notes Contest Closed
we will give away 3 copies to the lucky winners, which will be announced in the forum next week.
Wait a minute, WAV, Aiff = OK but MP3, M4a? Those are lossy formats, you can’t do anything with PN except adjusting track volume without degrading the quality! It may sound better for your ear because of dynamic/no-clipping sound but overall you get a bit lower quality. Especially some higher frequencies can be degraded because of recompression.
So wait, PN makes duplicates of your files…right. Does that mean that since you have the newer “enhanced/corrected” file that you can get rid of the original with out repercussions ?
First and foremost thanks. I can’t wait to use the program, I have a few files that I think of right now that can benefit from the program.
Winning is good…
i just got PN for mac, scanned one track, and the sound quality was notably and reprehensibly bad. so much audible crunch. i thought, like MIK, i was getting a tool that would help someone without golden ears. was wrong.
my brother’s a recording engineer and when i told him about it he rattled off some engineer jargon about what this kind of software does and how it’s not for casual djs who want to scan every track. apparently it’s useful for certain stages of sound engineering, but not to make your record crate sound more crisp.
not pleased with platinum notes.
Good Day I just purchased the vci-100 and the tascam 122l and I am having trouble connecting the tascam for headphone use any suggestions I am using a macbook. With the vcI came the program Tractor3le but having a problem cueing songs b4 playing………..Help
THE WAY.
MAC BOOK PRO + ABLETON LIVE 7 + MIXED IN KEY + PLATINUM NOTES = HAPPY HUMAN
JESUS LOVES YOU
I've been waiting and watching. Watching at waiting. A bit like the Guinness commercial. But finally it's here: the Windows version of PN. Wooo! I'm buying it tonight, having already heard the results of what it can do on my mate's Mac.
Just a little comment to add on the earlier discussion of clipped peaks. I agree 100% that what is gone is gone – you can't recreate the waveform of a clipped peak once it has been chopped through digital over-maximising. However, if you look closely at the examples of repaired waveforms on PN's pages, you will see that each peak has been very subtly 'rounded off'. It has NOT reduced the overall level of the track at all – it should still hit the peak of 0dB at the loudest point.
What *has* happened is a lot more clever.
The reason clipped tracks sound bad is due to distortion at the speakers. The sharp corners of the square-clipped peaks cause the speaker cones to react in an unnatural manner which sounds unpleasant. What PN does is to smooth off these corners without killing the dynamics.
(As an aside, good *analogue* maximizing processors tend to give a less pronounced clip in the first place, which is why they are highly sought after.)
Ooops, sorry to answer late, didn't see your comment earlier.
As for the autogain, Traktor is quite good, but you got a better effect with PN. Traktor only change the gain while PN use a limiter to raise the volume of the track, and this sounds more consistent.
How consistent is PN's volume adjustment between tracks?
I find Traktor's auto gain set to 'perceptive' mode is pretty good but occasionally gets things wrong.
Would PN be more consistent?
Thanks for the review Nico, you did a great job! We have thought about releasing a demo, but in the meantime anyone is welcome to email me tracks they would like demoed, and I will gladly process them for you:
chad (at) mixedinkey (dot) com
I look forward to hearing from you soon.
Best,
Chad Pranke
Mixed In Key
Business Development Coordinator
Thank you for that, I love PN, but everyone should always consider the possibilities in dynamic sound.
Thanks for the kind words everyone!
I think that the developers will have problem selling this software as long as they don't make a demo. Sound is very subjective, and when you claim that you have an automatic remastering tool, you automatically arouse the suspicion of snake oil. PN may be the dope for you, or it may not, or not on every track.
I think it is just a tool, and I like to do smooth flowing PNed sets, but I certainly won't play PNed tracks all night long, because this has the potential to become boring, always the same sound in your ear.
This software can be a life saver for some bad quality tracks, it can bring back from the dead squished recordings automatically, and save you hours of remastering (that is if you have the knowledge and monitoring environment to be able to do remastering in the first place), and it gives consistent results across tracks, which is totally invaluable because it is very hard and time consuming to do it on your own.
This is a software I believe in, I mean, the idea has a great potential, and can be expanded and refined in a lot of ways.
Besides, the developers 'eat their own dog food' as the saying goes, they are Djs, and they use their software to play out. This is quite rare in the industry 🙂 You should take a look at the forums http://community.mixedinkey.com/Participate.aspx?… you'll see that they are very open to feedback, and that they have an outstanding customer support.
<blockquote cite="#comment-8226">Sweet review.
I agree- sweet review!
Damn. 10.5.4 broke XLD, it is going to take a bit longer to get the audio examples out, think I'll do it with Logic.
@Brendan Yep, there is no way to recover information from a clipped digital recording, it is just off the map. What you can do is get some headroom back by lowering the volume, and then interpolate what it could have been. Should sound less harsh. Dunno if that is really what they are doing, looks like it from the screenshots. I've matched levels with the autogain and did A/B listening tests, and the processed version sounded less harsh to me. By the way, this is a pretty extreme example,I ran the song at over +6db, real clipped stuff isn't THAT bad 🙂
I like having a eq and a comp just before the final output so that the mix sound together. Doing it in reverse (that is, mastering the tracks themselves) give a totally different sound and doesn't have the drawbacks (a compressor at the end stage always take some life out of the mix in my opinion).
What would be great would be posting 5 very different songs that mix well, both processed and unprocessed and let people judge. Of course I can't do that for obvious legal reasons. This software badly needs a demo.
You have the option to save your processed tracks in wav, so no loss due to transcoding.
I hate to be a buzz kill, but the program isn't "repairing" the clipped mp3s. There's no way to recover the information that was clipped out of the first recording. It is gone forever. All the program seems to be doing is reducing the volume so that the clipped peaks aren't hitting 0db anymore. They're still clipped though. Listen to both examples, match levels so that they are playing at the same volume, and you will find that they pretty much sound identical.
I don't know. The audiophile in me hates the idea of this program. I'm sure it does make your mixes sound smoother and more unified but the idea of it just doesn't sit well with me. Plus, transcoding mp3s is never a good idea. I personally wouldn't use it, but that doesn't mean I don't see its usefulness.
Overall, to be totally honest, I must say that you loose a bit of clarity and punch because of the processing, all your tracks take on a 'smooth' quality. This makes mixing easier and more flowy, and is less tiring to the ear in the long run, but if you insist on having the 'purer' sound you may not like what it does. I'll add some sound sample to the article soon. The 1.0 processing was clearer, but a bit on the hollow side, this version sounds better on a big system. I guess that they will be able to strike a balance.
@McRossi I guess that this accounts for it! Will test it out, I turn off the auto gain anyway when I play processed tracks, as you should, so this may be it.
Great review Nico *thumbs up*
This can be found in the .NML file that represents the playlist you are working from. I think if you re-analyze the track it will be fine.
Is it possible that you played these tracks previously in Traktor and it already recorded an auto gain setting for each track, so when you played the tracks again after using PN on them, Traktor continued to use the previously recorded settings for auto gain.
Sweet review.
@Elvis: They have both a Windows and Mac version. I guess that if you win, you will get the version that fit your OS. I have a Mac, so I reviewed the Mac version, but I think the functionalities are the same
haha, i like your comment regarding the over-compression on just about all justice tracks. for home listening i have to say i like the compression but through a nice pa i can definitely see the advantage of having "PNed" the songs. good to think about
great article!
Any schedule to release a Windows version?
On a separate note great tutorial it really helps you make a good decision wether to buy it.
Crossing my fingers now
i have it plantium notes for windows and it works like a charm. if i win this mac (user) one, could i give it away? =)
i'm 3rd!
Sounds very promissing, Im definatly gonna check it out..!
So I just clicked on that link and was the first post on this blog entry… I win right?! LOL!
p.s. Ean, thanks for your latest video on the VCI300 much appreciated!